LAS LENGUAS INGLESA Y ESPAÑOLA de Delfín Carbonell

 Tengo a mi alrededor gente a la que le encanta ponerme de los nervios, pincharme para que salte y pierda la calma. Esto, en román paladino, se llama buscarle las cosquillas a alguien o hacerle rabiar . Lo malo es que lo consiguen. Por mucho que trate de mantener la calma y no darles el gusto de verme sulfurado, they push my buttons, and I take the bait . Por ejemplo: Mi amigo Peláez sabe exactamente cómo hacerme rabiar hablando de política, lo que en inglés podríamos traducir como: My friend Peláez knows exactly how to push my buttons by talking about politics. Me gusta esta expresión inglesa porque lo de 'buttons' nos recuerda a 'tecla',  que en castellano también se usa figuradamente: tocar las teclas de alguien. He encontrado las siguientes citaciones de uso, para que no se diga: — “… but you don’t want to push his buttons because he can turn very vicious.” Sporting News , September 8, 2006. US. — “… and Jimmy would keep pushing her buttons until she’d lose her te...

Yesterday, someone who knows no English congratulated me on my mastery of the language. I have also been told that my Spanish is good. I take these compliments with a grain of salt, since they come from unqualified experts. The question of language proficiency is one I often ponder. The study of a language is a lifelong endeavor, and there is always something to learn, correct, or improve. If my reader is studying Spanish, allow me, by way of digression, to offer three pieces of advice: 1. Avoid the passive voice whenever possible. Do not say David ha sido visto when the more natural Han visto a David will do. Spanish often prefers the active construction where English readily resorts to the passive. 2. Use the progressive form only when it is needed. Do not say Estoy yendo a casa when Voy a casa expresses the same idea more naturally. The progressive is not a substitute for the simple present. 3. Learn the subjunctive thoroughly—and use it. Do not automatically translate as far as...

 I believe I have already mentioned the truism that society has taken great strides forward in its attitudes toward marriage and births out of wedlock. What was considered a sin and looked down upon a few generations ago may today pass without raising an eyebrow. The expression born on the wrong side of the blanket refers to someone born outside marriage. It is an old-fashioned, somewhat euphemistic way of describing what was once regarded as a social stigma. Given the changes in society's attitudes toward such births, one might assume that the expression has become obsolete. And yet, it continues to appear in literature: “I was born on the wrong side of the blanket.” Anya Seton, Winthrop Woman , 1958. “… those royal romances which always seemed to involve births on the wrong side of the blanket.”   Time magazine, February 21, 1969. “… born on the wrong side of the blanket.”  Barbara Kingsolver, Demon Copperhead , 2022. These examples might lead us to question whet...

Escucho y leo a literatos, profesores, periodistas, hombres de letras, que explican en artículos y entrevistas, que poseen en casa enormes bibliotecas con muchos, muchos libros. Es más, creo recordar que había un programa televisivo donde el reportero recorría bibliotecas privadas de famosos, cuyas estancias estaban  atiborradas de libros, colocados en estanterías, debajo de las mesas, en la cocina, en la bañera. Vi la de Amando de Miguel y Luis Alberto de Cuenca, y quizá otros cuyos nombres se han borrado de mi memoria senil. Arturo Pérez Reverte se ufana en las redes de tener 32.000 volúmenes en su casa. Recuerdo el horror de ver tantos libros desperdigados y apilados de mala manera. Un verdadero sinsentido. Aparte de la sabiduría tradicional, eso implica polvo, mucho polvo.  Saco mi ábaco y calculo: Si tengo 30.000 títulos y leo uno a la semana, sin saltarme ninguna semana, leeré 52 al año. Para leer los 30.000 libros necesitaré 577 años en números redondos. Claro que si le...

Postscript Whatever happened to Lewis Perelman, the man who predicted the demise of conventional education? He did not disappear immediately after publishing School’s Out in 1992. He continued to write and work on policy issues, and an interview published in 1997 shows him still defending his thesis.  Yet today, Perelman seems to have faded from public discussion, while the schools he declared obsolete are still standing. His predictions deserve revisiting. Perhaps that, too, is a lesson in the unpredictability of the future. Perhaps Dr. Perelman's mistake was not to predict that school would disappear, but to underestimate its capacity to survive. Or perhaps the real revolution is still to come. Dr. Lewis Joel Perelman, born in 1946, passed away on March 10, 2026. 

Has the internet and technology truly changed traditional classroom education? Are students learning more, and learning better? In 2002, while preparing the fourth volume of my English in Action , an English grammar for Spanish speakers ( hispanohablantes ), I wanted to make it a chrestomathy of educated English: a selection of passages designed to help learners master a language. I included poetry, short stories, newspaper articles, and literary essays. During my research, I came across a review in the Financial Times titled “Is Education Outdated?” It discussed Lewis Perelman's School's Out: Hyperlearning, The New Technology, and the End of Education , published by William Morrow in 1992. I found the review sufficiently persuasive to obtain permission to reprint it. According to the reviewer, Perelman argued that conventional education was obsolete and that investing in school reform was like investing in the horse and buggy at the dawn of the twentieth century while ignorin...